Texas recently enacted Senate Bill 4 (SB4), which will significantly change the state’s approach to immigration. It is scheduled to take effect on March 5th. This law authorizes state police to detain individuals suspected of illegal border crossings. However, this move has sparked considerable controversy and legal challenges, including a potential lawsuit from the US Department of Justice (DOJ) due to constitutional concerns.
Federal Government’s Constitutional Concerns
The DOJ’s main argument against SB4 is that immigration laws are under the federal government’s jurisdiction, particularly after cases such as the 2012 United States vs. Arizona case. The DOJ also argued that SB4 “violates the United States Constitution” and stressed that state laws like SB4 cannot interfere with federal immigration procedures.
Texas Governor’s Defense of SB4
However, Texas Governor Greg Abbott has defended SB4. Taking to X, formerly known as Twitter, he has defended Texas’ right to enforce laws against illegal immigration. He said, “The Biden Admin. not only refuses to enforce current US immigration laws, they now want to stop Texas from enforcing laws against illegal immigration.”
Further Defense
Abbott then continued criticizing President Biden and his administration, saying, “I’ve never seen such hostility to the rule of law in America. Biden is destroying America. Texas is trying to save it.” In a public appearance, Abbott said, “The consequences of it are so extreme that the people being smuggled by the cartels, they will not want to be coming into the state of Texas.”
Impact on Texas Communities
SB4 could profoundly affect Texas communities, particularly those with significant immigrant populations. Critics, including US Rep. Greg Casar, argue that the law could detract from addressing real crimes and strain relations with Mexico. He said, “Asking local police to hunt down Texans who look like immigrants doesn’t make us safer: in fact, it takes police away from investigating real crime.”
Civil Rights Concerns and Lawsuits
Civil rights organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Texas Civil Rights Project, have filed lawsuits against SB4. They argue that the law violates the US Constitution’s supremacy clause. They believe it could lead to racial profiling and unjust treatment of Black and Brown Texans, disrupting families and funneling individuals into the deportation pipeline.
Mexican President’s Critique
Mexican President López Obrador has also criticized Governor Abbott’s policies as an attempt to gain popularity. He suggested that such actions could backfire politically on Governor Abbott. His government plans to challenge SB4, marking the law’s potential to strain U.S.-Mexico relations.
White House’s Stance
Currently, President Biden has not publicly commented on SB4. However, a White House spokesperson described it as “an extreme law that will make communities in Texas less safe.” They added, “Generally speaking, the federal government — not individual states — is charged with determining how and when to remove noncitizens for violating immigration laws.”
Border Security and Immigration Enforcement
This new measure is part of Texas’ new approach to border security. This includes using razor wire and a floating buoy in the Rio Grande, while also establishing the Texas tactical border force. Under SB4, so-called ‘sanctuary cities’ would be banned in Texas. These cities “prohibit local law enforcement from inquiring about a person’s immigration status and complying with detainer requests.”
Federal and State Legal Authority
The DOJ’s lawsuit continues to stress the exclusive federal authority over immigration. Federal court decisions support this position. In 2012, the US Supreme Court ruled that local police do not have the authority to arrest individuals solely based on their immigration status. Instead, immigration law enforcement is up to the federal government.
Texas’ Response to Federal Inaction
Abbott and other Texas officials argue that SB4 is a response to Biden’s apparent inaction on border security. Representative David Spiller, who supports SB4, said, “SB4 is the Texas solution to a Texas problem. It is a humane, logical, and efficient approach to a problem created and fostered by the Biden administration’s continued failure and refusal to secure our border.”
Legal Protections and Liability Issues
SB4 protects state and local officials from lawsuits resulting from enforcing immigration policies. Critics have argued this immunity could lead to less accountability in law enforcement actions. There are concerns about the potential for racial profiling and dangerous interactions with police.
Operational and Financial Impact on Local Jails
Sheriff Larry Smith is the president of the Sheriff’s Association of Texas. He spoke about the potential consequences of the law, saying, “Every county jail in the state of Texas could be impacted by these unlawful presence arrestees.” He showed concern about the significant financial burden this would place on local governments for jailing, prosecuting, and providing defense for migrants charged under the bill.
Potential Challenges to Constitutionality
Many former immigration judges, both Republican and Democrat, have released a statement claiming that SB4 is unlawful. In it, they said, “Immigration is plainly a federal function. State legislators cannot enact immigration laws for the same reasons that the United States Congress cannot enact Texas state legislation.”
Further SB4 Details
SB4 will also treat illegal immigration as a felony instead of a misdemeanor. This would allow law enforcement officials “to arrest undocumented immigrants anywhere in the state.” This new change would allow these officials to arrest any illegal immigrants outside of the border region of the state.
Implications for US Citizens and Legal Residents
Texas Representative Victoria Neave Criado argued that SB4 could lead to the wrongful arrest of US citizens or legal residents. These people may live near the border and may not have proof of citizenship readily available. There have been historical cases of immigration agents mistakenly arresting US citizens.
International Diplomatic Challenges
The law could face a significant roadblock if the Mexican government refuses to accept non-Mexican immigrants deported by Texas. Mexico is not obligated to accept these individuals, which could create diplomatic tensions. However, Abbott claims he will “be able to work that out.”
Inclusion of Border Wall Funding
Alongside SB4, the Texas Legislature has approved funding for other border barriers, including walls, fences, and floating buoys. However, like SB4, these measures have also been controversial. Texas officials were ordered to remove the barrier as they did not ask the federal government if they could. This ruling was later successfully appealed.
Potential Injunction and Future Legal Battles
There are currently many legal challenges against SB4, and there will likely be many more. Opponents of SB4 may request an injunction to halt the law. Similar laws in other states have been struck down by the Supreme Court in the past, highlighting the controversial nature of state-level immigration enforcement.
Read More
Terrifying Prospects: 12 Moves Trump Could Unleash If Re-elected in 2024
21 Things MAGA Followers Permanently Destroyed For Everyone Else